Veronique Ingram / Mark Findlay/ bankruptcy Regulation
foLLOWING IS THE STATISTICS FOR  2010-2011 ANNUAL REPORT

As you can see Bankruptcy Regulation considered only 11 per cent of complaints were justified!!!!
This is because AFSA is using S 134/3 to fuck everyone over!! 
Clearly it is time that this practice is exposed.
The fucker Matthew Osborne is giving corrupt legal advice to AFSA and now skanky Veronique Ingram is to be cross examined in court why she fails to act on this 
  Table 8: All practitioners – complaints
While the percentage of justified complaints increased marginally it is pleasing to note that the number of complaints received in 2010–11 decreased.

	2008-09	2009-10	2010-11
Number of complaints received	418	434	401
Percentage of complaints found to be justified	17%	10%	11%
Number of complaints not requiring investigation	189	195	214
Complaints not requiring investigation finalised within 14 days (standard 80%)	100%	97%	92%
Number of complaints investigated	229	239	187
Actual percentage of investigative complaints finalised within 60 days (standard 80%)	85%	86%	87%

Trustee complaints

Of the 401 complaints received in 2010–11, 335 were against registered trustees and the Official Trustee (343 in 2009–10).
These complaints encompassed six main areas:

• lack of information or responsiveness - 29% (25%)
• decisions concerning the claiming or disposal of assets - 21% (21%)
• the extent of trustees’ fees and costs - 10% (11%)
• delays in the administration or lack of action - 15% (9%)
• inappropriate conduct or conflict of interest - 9% (11%)
• income and contribution liability assessments - 5% (4%)

Chris Kenny v The Chaser - an update

A judge has ruled that Chris Kenny's defamation against the ABC can proceed to a jury.

And talking of disrepute ...

Let us turn to news of Chris Kenny, columnist at The Australian, who was famously portrayed as a "dogf***er" last year by the ABC’s The Hamster Decides.

We’re not going to show you the photoshopped image, but it was much like this one, which The Chaser team sent to Media Watch when we questioned whether their attack on Kenny was either funny or smart.

Last week, in the NSW Supreme Court, Kenny won the first round of his legal action against the ABC and Chaser team, which prompted this reaction from Ben Fordham on Sydney Radio


BEN FORDHAM: A judge has ruled, that the ABC was defamatory, against journalist Chris Kenny after it aired a skit, with him engaging in bestiality ...

— 2GB, Sydney Live, 6th March, 2014

In fact, the judge has merely ruled that the case can proceed to a jury.

And he threw out the most serious imputation that the skit suggested Kenny actually had sex with dogs.

But Justice Beech-Jones did call the Chaser’s attack ‘grossly disproportionate’ and he suggested it could cause people to conclude Kenny was a 'low, contemptible and disgusting person'.

That could be tough to defend.

But it will be up to a four-person jury to decide whether that meaning arose and whether Kenny was in fact defamed.

If Kenny were to win, damages of up to $355,000 could then be awarded by the judge, with costs on top.

But there’s far more than that at stake, not least because the Prime Minister has suggested the ABC should not fight the case.


TONY ABBOTT: Well, the point I make is that, government money should be spent sensibly. And defending the indefensible is not a very good way to spend government money and, next time the ABC comes to the government looking for more money, this is the kind of thing that we would want to ask them questions about.

— 2GB, Sydney Live, 6th March, 2014

Tony Abbott’s warning to the ABC ... and the Kenny court decision ... were covered at length in The Australian, with two news articles and a further comment piece all making the point that the ABC should say sorry and drop its defence.

The Oz also quoted Chris Kenny telling Channel 9 that the ABC’s refusal to say sorry had forced him to take action.

As Kenny told Media Watch:


CHRIS KENNY: The ABC had weeks to negotiate an apology but there was no attempt to deal with that, they dug their heels in from the start.

— Chris Kenny, Journalist, 7th March, 2014

Now, Chris Kenny is a journalist and a champion of free speech, so we can’t agree that he was forced to sue.

And it was not just an apology he was after. He also wanted money both for compensation and for legal costs.

But demanding the public broadcaster apologize is a popular theme with his employer, The Australian, and ABC managing director Mark Scott is one of their favourite targets.

YOUR COMMENTS

Offensive words/ 474.17

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: stephen.grodzicki@cdpp.gov.au
CC: nuckhley.succar@afp.gov.au
Subject: RE: Considering defeat? [DLM=Sensitive:Legal]
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:28:58 +1100

Hi Stephen,
further to the amended charges  which you are attempting to intimidate me with  it is interesting you are trying to  fuck me over and try to charge me simply with using offensive words.
Clearly the Summary Offences  Act could only jail me for 3 months for offending someone so considering the Crimes Act has a penalty of 3 years  then I would consider that to offend the corrupt staff at  AFSA which  the Commonwealth Ombudsman are protecting requires a much higher level to anything I have posted.
I also refer to the additional statement which you are seeking leave to serve .
Please correct me if I am wrong but I understand that Magistrate Buscombe told you to kiss his arse concerning them.
Cheers

CDPP attempting to protect Frau and Corruption
From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: stephen.grodzicki@cdpp.gov.au
CC: nuckhley.succar@afp.gov.au
Subject: RE: Considering defeat? [DLM=Sensitive:Legal]
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:03:34 +1100

Hi Stephen,
Clearly you wish to help me expose corruption at AFSA so please inform me that you will have all the requested witnesses I requested in court on the 24th March.
Also please supply me with a copy of all ammendments by tomorrow as discussed in court today. I require a copy of these to be sent by email and also by Express post.
Thanking you for your assistance in exposing corrupt practices in Government departments
Fiona Brown

Jane Brockington VCGLR subpoenaed to give evidence she is protecting corrupt employee Adam Toma
 Jane Brockington is stepping aside from the VCGLR on the 24th March 2014 just in time to give evidence on the 28 th March 2014 .

 Clearly there is no integrity to this skank who protects corruption and fraud.